LGBTQ Genealogy – Part 6

Using the term “Partner” in Census Records

The term “Partner” was used in State and Federal census enumerations in the 20th Century. An example is the 1915 New York census entry for Anne Clark and Adele Albro, enumerated as Partners.

Use of the term “Partner” was vaguely defined in 1915 Instructions to Enumerators and reads as “If two or more persons share a common abode as partners, write “head” for one and “partner” for the other.” (See Image 1.) Equally vague are the 1940 U.S. Census instructions, which were similar to instructions from prior years. “If two or more persons who are not related by blood or marriage share a common dwelling unit as partners, write head for one and partner for the other or others.”

Using Steve Morse’s census search tool, I was able to quantify how many times the term partner was used in 20th-century census records.  It appears anywhere between 78,000 to 185,000 times.

Census Year No. of Partners
1940 185,708
1930 78,915
1920 80,141
1910 112,256
1900 98,374

However, investigating these records leads to several examples where “Partner” was used for convents. In London, Madison, Ohio in the 1940 U.S. Census we find an example of four nuns living together. The first is listed as “Head” and the others are “Partners”.  Sister Mary Charles is enumerated as head of household. Sister Mary Baptist, Sister Mary Anastasia and Sister Mary Paschal are all listed as “Partner”.

The term “Partner” is used to describe the relationship of movie stars Randolph Scott & Cary Grant in their 1940 enumeration. (See Image 2).  These leading men met in 1932 and lived together for 12 years in a beach house dubbed “Bachelor Hall” by powerful Hollywood studios, which controlled their public and private lives. They always denied being lovers though rumors about their relationship persist. In the 1940 Census, Randolph is the Head and Cary is shown as Partner. (See Image 3.)

As with all evidence, genealogists will need to interpret and analyze each piece for ourselves and our family’s story. The Enumeration of Scott & Grant is consistent with instructions for Census workers. Only considering other evidence will we be able to put “partner” into the appropriate context.

The term “Partner” is not a completely reliable means of identifying same-sex couples in the census, but it has been used by enumerators, so look for it in your searches.

State of New York, Census of 1915 – Instructions to Enumerators (Woodgate History: State of New York, 1915), page 17; digital images, Woodgate History Library).
1940 U.S. Census, Santa Monica, Los Angeles, California, pop. sch., Roll: m-t0627-00256, enumeration district (ED) 19-765, Page: 20B, Household ID 1018, Randolph Scott and Cary Grant; digital images, Ancestry.com. 
By |2019-01-14T06:33:23+00:00January 15th, 2019|Categories: LGBTQ Genealogy|Tags: , |

2 Comments

  1. Lisa Gorrell January 17, 2019 at 6:19 am - Reply

    My grandmother lived with her four children and another woman in Cucamonga, San Bernardino, California in 1940. She is head and the other woman was listed as partner. When I asked my aunts about this woman, they said she was a co-worker at a cafe. The meaning here was clearly that two unrelated adults were living in the same abode. Two months later my grandmother and children were in Napa, California. Loving your series!

  2. Diane January 20, 2019 at 8:13 am - Reply

    Thank you for your posts on this topic. I do both historical and genealogical research and have run into several instances where I strongly suspect that an individual was in a same sex relationship. I look forward to learning more about documenting and analyzing the evidence. I have also struggled with the how’s and why’s of including this information so I appreciate your very thoughtful comments on the topic.

    I am particularly drawn to a great uncle who I believe isolated himself from the family for this very reason although at this point, I have very little if any evidence to point to. Can we learn from this, or otherwise provide information which is helpful to current and future generations. Should we account for what we may presume to have been the person’s desire to be private about their personal life?? Is speculation helpful here at all? I am also researching a historical figure, and the evidence there seems fairly substantial (lived and buried together) from the late 19th century to the early 20th century.

    Again so many questions so I really appreciate learning more from you about this.

    thanks.

Leave A Comment